Personal injury
$730,000
Passenger injury recovery
We recovered $730,000 for a passenger injured when a vehicle turned into oncoming traffic.
Meet our personal injury attorney: Maxie Lawton
Read case detailsA Virginia speeding citation should be evaluated from the actual summons, the alleged speed, the posted limit, the cited statute, and the court named on the document. Some allegations are traffic infractions. Others may be charged as reckless driving, which Virginia classifies separately. Paying a prepayable ticket is also a legal choice: the Virginia Judicial System states that prepayment results in a finding of guilt.
This page describes the speeding-ticket matters listed in The Phoenix Trial Firm’s published serious-traffic practice. It provides general information current as of August 21, 2026. It does not evaluate a particular charge or predict a court, DMV, insurance, employment, or licensing result.
Virginia Code § 46.2-870 states Virginia’s general maximum speed limits unless another maximum applies. Other statutes address particular roads, vehicles, zones, or circumstances. The code section printed on the summons is therefore more useful than a generic label such as “speeding ticket.”
Virginia Code § 46.2-862 provides that a person may be guilty of reckless driving by speed when driving at least twenty miles per hour above the applicable maximum speed limit or more than eighty-five miles per hour regardless of that limit. The wording matters: a speed of exactly eighty-five miles per hour does not satisfy the statute’s “in excess of eighty-five” clause by itself, although another clause or statute may apply.
Virginia also has a general reckless-driving statute, § 46.2-852, and other specific reckless-driving provisions. A webpage should not recast the charge. Review the exact statute, speed allegation, location, and court record.
An ordinary speeding conviction and a reckless-driving conviction do not have identical classifications or consequences. Virginia Code § 46.2-868 generally classifies reckless driving as a Class 1 misdemeanor, subject to the statute’s additional provisions. Virginia Code § 18.2-11 states the authorized punishment range for a Class 1 misdemeanor. Those maximums do not predict the sentence in an individual matter.
The summons and online court record can help identify whether the allegation is a traffic infraction, reckless driving, or another offense. Do not rely on the number of miles per hour over the limit alone when the citation lists a specific code section.
Virginia General District Courts hear traffic cases. The Virginia Judicial System’s traffic-case information page links to court records, payment information, and court contact details. The summons should identify the court and appearance date, but schedules and instructions should be confirmed through the court’s current official page or clerk’s office.
The Judicial System’s official traffic-ticket payment guidance explains that prepaying a prepayable ticket results in a finding of guilt and that points may be added to the driver’s license. Not every charge is prepayable. A person deciding how to respond should read the summons and official court instructions before making a payment or missing an appearance.
Whether an attorney can appear without a particular client, whether a continuance is available, and what documents a court will accept are court- and case-specific questions. This page does not promise that a person can avoid appearing or that any charge will be reduced.
The Virginia DMV’s Moving Violations and Point Assessments page states that a court reports a traffic conviction to DMV, which then posts the conviction and assigns demerit points when the violation carries them. DMV publishes separate current lists for three-point, four-point, and six-point violations.
Demerit-point validity and conviction retention are not the same thing. DMV states that demerit points remain valid for two years from the offense date, while the conviction may remain visible for a different period shown beside the particular violation. A simplified statement that every speeding conviction remains for one fixed period is therefore unreliable.
DMV provides an official process to request a driver record. A current record can help identify the exact conviction description, offense date, point category, prior history, and any DMV action. Insurance companies may use systems that differ from Virginia DMV demerit points, so this page does not estimate premiums or coverage decisions.
A commercial driver should review the ordinary traffic charge and the separate commercial-license rules. DMV’s CDL Disqualifications page distinguishes major violations, serious violations, railroad-crossing violations, out-of-service orders, and other categories. The result can depend on the offense, vehicle, prior history, and whether the conduct occurred in a commercial motor vehicle. A general speeding chart cannot predict a CDL consequence.
A driver licensed outside Virginia should also check the rules of the licensing jurisdiction. A Virginia court disposition and a home-state licensing response are different questions. Court-appearance requirements should be confirmed from the summons and the Virginia court; no universal appearance waiver should be assumed.
A first review usually starts with existing records rather than assumptions about an outcome. Depending on the matter, useful information may include:
Preserve originals and do not alter a record. The relevance, admissibility, and legal effect of an item require individual review.
Past results, ratings, and general advertising do not predict the disposition of another charge. The appropriate questions depend on the actual citation and the person’s circumstances.
The Phoenix Trial Firm’s public attorney profiles list serious traffic matters among the firm’s practice areas and describe representation throughout Hampton Roads and elsewhere in Virginia. To ask whether the firm is available to review a Virginia speeding citation, call 757-777-9285 or use the firm’s contact page. Sending a message does not mean the firm has accepted the matter and does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tell us what happened, or call 757-777-9285.
An inquiry does not create an attorney-client relationship; representation requires our agreement. Please wait for instructions before sending confidential or time-sensitive material.
"*" indicates required fields
1807 S. Church Street, Suite 200C
Smithfield, VA 23430
2 Eaton Street, Suite 900
Hampton, VA 23669
Copyright © 2026 The Phoenix Trial Firm• All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy. Digital Marketing By:
A welcome from our team
Welcome to The Phoenix Trial Firm. We help people across Hampton Roads with personal injury, criminal defense, DUI, and serious traffic matters. Tell us what brought you here, and our team will help you understand your next steps.
Get a Free Consultation Or call 757-777-9285Hampton Roads trial lawyers
We help injured people and those facing criminal, DUI, or serious traffic charges across Hampton Roads.
Offices in Hampton & Smithfield
Your first conversation
Choose the matter you want to discuss. See how to get started and what to have ready for the conversation.

Start with the collision, your questions, and the changes it has brought to your life.
Good to knowYou do not need every document to make your first inquiry.
Start a conversationTell us when and where the collision happened and how to reach you. A short description is enough to begin an inquiry.
Our team reviews your inquiry. The conversation can cover your injuries, treatment, missed work, insurance questions, and possible next steps.
If we agree to represent you, we explain the scope of our work, fees and costs, and the information needed to begin preparing your claim.

A focused first conversation starts with the matter, the court, and your immediate questions.
Good to knowThis guide introduces the firm’s inquiry process; it does not change any court instruction or deadline.
Start a conversationTell us the charge, the locality or court, and any upcoming court date. Include your contact information so our team can review your inquiry.
Have your charging papers and questions ready for the conversation. We can discuss whether Phoenix is available to review your matter and what a consultation would cover.
If we agree to represent you, we explain the scope of the work and the fee arrangement. Preparation then begins around your particular facts and circumstances.

The details on the summons help us understand the matter you want to discuss.
Good to knowFor DUI or DWI inquiries, choose Criminal defense & DUI above. This overview does not determine whether you must appear in court. That question requires a review of your specific matter.
Start a conversationTell us the charge description, locality or court, and date shown on your summons or later court notice. For speed-related matters, note the alleged speed and posted limit.
Our team reviews your inquiry so we can discuss the circumstances and possible next steps. Mention any work-related driving or license concerns you want considered.
If we agree to represent you, we explain the work covered and the fee arrangement. Your case is prepared around its specific charge, evidence, and circumstances.
Our clients. Our work.
We represent people facing injury, criminal charges, and serious traffic matters. Here are seven outcomes from our work.
Personal injury
Passenger injury recovery
We recovered $730,000 for a passenger injured when a vehicle turned into oncoming traffic.
Meet our personal injury attorney: Maxie Lawton
Read case detailsCriminal defense & DUI
DUI: second offense
Not guilty of second-offense DUI. A conviction on the separate refusal charge remained.
Read case detailsCriminal defense
Strangulation — Chesapeake Circuit Court
The strangulation charge was dismissed. The separate domestic assault and battery charge received a first-offender deferred disposition.
Read case detailsCriminal defense
Felony eluding
The Commonwealth chose not to proceed with the felony-eluding prosecution. Driver identification was the central issue.
Read case detailsCriminal defense
Domestic assault and battery
The court dismissed the charge after considering the client’s testimony, injury photographs, and cross-examination.
Read case detailsCriminal defense
Firearm charges · preliminary hearing
Both charges were dismissed at the Norfolk preliminary hearing and were not certified to circuit court.
Read case detailsSerious traffic
Reckless driving
A challenge to the radar evidence led to a granted motion to strike and dismissal of the reckless-driving charge.
Read case detailsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Passenger injury recovery
Our client was a passenger in a vehicle when the driver turned into oncoming traffic. A severe arm injury required emergency surgery.
The vehicle’s policy provided $250,000 in coverage. Phoenix pursued an underinsured motorist claim and stacked multiple policies for an additional $480,000 in coverage.
We recovered $730,000 for our client.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Second-offense DUI and a separate refusal charge
A stop for failing to obey a highway lane marking led to charges of second-offense DUI and refusal of an official breath test.
The officer reported a slight odor of alcohol and slightly slurred speech. There were no field-sobriety or chemical test results. Phoenix challenged whether the evidence proved DUI beyond a reasonable doubt.
The court found the client not guilty of second-offense DUI because the evidence did not establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The client was convicted of the separate refusal charge.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Chesapeake Circuit Court
Our client faced strangulation and domestic assault and battery charges in Chesapeake Circuit Court following a physical altercation with a partner.
Dante Wright cross-examined the complainant about the reported effects of the altercation. The testimony included no loss of consciousness, no neck marks or bruising, and no hospital treatment or documented neck injury. The defense challenged whether the evidence established the bodily injury required for the strangulation charge and moved to strike.
The court granted the motion to strike and dismissed the strangulation charge. On the separate domestic assault and battery charge, the court found sufficient evidence but granted a first-offender deferred disposition. That charge was not dismissed at this stage.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Felony eluding
A vehicle registered to our client was clocked at more than 100 mph and crashed near a wooded area after police gave chase. It was empty when the officer arrived. Our client was charged with felony eluding.
The vehicle’s registration and personal items linked it to our client, but the officer had no description identifying him as the driver. Phoenix challenged whether the evidence established who was driving. Our client reported the vehicle stolen that night and said he was elsewhere with a sibling.
The Commonwealth chose not to proceed with the felony-eluding charge, which was resolved by nolle prosequi in circuit court.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Navy servicemember · Newport News
Our client, a Navy servicemember, faced a domestic assault and battery charge involving her child’s father.
Dante Wright called our client to testify about the incident, introduced photographs showing bruising and redness on her neck and injuries to her face, and cross-examined the complainant.
The Newport News Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court dismissed the charge. Considering our client’s injuries and the absence of evidence of significant injuries to the complainant, the judge could not determine who was the aggressor.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Norfolk General District Court
Our client faced charges of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and second-offense carrying a concealed weapon at a preliminary hearing in Norfolk General District Court.
Dante Wright cross-examined the officers about the evidence linking our client to the firearm. Officers found an object resembling a gun holster on our client, but no firearm. The gun was recovered elsewhere outside an apartment complex, away from our client. No link to the client or the holster was established; fingerprint testing was inconclusive, and no DNA evidence connected him to the firearm.
Both charges were dismissed at the preliminary hearing and were not certified to circuit court.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
A challenge to the radar evidence
Our client faced a reckless-driving charge involving a radar speed measurement.
At trial, the officer could not confirm that the radar had been checked before and after the shift and found accurate. No calibration certificate was presented. Dante Wright moved to strike the evidence.
The court granted the motion to strike and dismissed the reckless-driving charge.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Answers before your first call
Understand the records to preserve, insurance questions to ask, and how we help injured drivers and passengers.
Read the car-accident guide →Follow the process from investigation and treatment documentation through negotiation and, when appropriate, litigation.
Explore the claim process →Get to know Phoenix
Meet the people behind the firm and learn what to expect when you reach out.
A quick introduction from Dante Wright