A motor vehicle collision can raise questions about safety, vehicle damage, insurance, injuries, and court procedures. The legal and insurance issues depend on the vehicles and people involved, the available evidence, the applicable policies, and Virginia law.
The Phoenix Trial Firm’s published practice information includes car, commercial-truck, rideshare, pedestrian, and bicycle collision matters. Its public attorney profiles describe personal-injury representation in Hampton Roads and across Virginia. Whether the firm can accept a particular matter depends on a case-specific review.
This page provides general information and does not predict liability, insurance coverage, damages, or any other result.
To ask whether the firm is available to review a Virginia motor vehicle matter, call 757-777-9285 or use the firm’s published contact information. Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles’ 2025 Traffic Crash Facts report lists separate crash totals for the seven Hampton Roads localities summarized below. Their crash counts sum to 20,236. That figure is The Phoenix Trial Firm’s calculation from the DMV’s separate rows for Chesapeake, Hampton, Newport News, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Suffolk, and Virginia Beach; it is not a DMV regional total. The table describes reported traffic-crash data, not the number of valid claims, lawsuits, clients, or matters handled by any law firm.
| Locality | Crashes | Fatalities | Injuries |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chesapeake | 2,054 | 25 | 1,794 |
| Hampton | 3,352 | 21 | 3,701 |
| Newport News | 3,426 | 18 | 2,685 |
| Norfolk | 3,966 | 26 | 2,306 |
| Portsmouth | 948 | 9 | 772 |
| Suffolk | 1,525 | 10 | 1,084 |
| Virginia Beach | 4,965 | 28 | 3,102 |
| Seven-locality sum | 20,236 | 137 | 15,444 |
Source: Virginia DMV, 2025 Virginia Traffic Crash Facts, jurisdiction table, pp. 3–4. Seven-locality sum calculated by The Phoenix Trial Firm.
Data year: 2025. Page data reviewed: August 23, 2026.
Regional travel commonly involves bridges, tunnels, interstates, and multiple localities. VDOT maintains an official Hampton Roads bridges-and-tunnels guide and provides current reported traffic conditions and cameras through 511 Virginia. These sources can help a visitor identify a route or crossing; they do not determine fault or preserve evidence for a claim.
| Official resource | What it provides |
|---|---|
| VDOT Hampton Roads bridges and tunnels | Names major crossings and identifies the localities and routes they connect. |
| 511 Virginia | Current reported conditions, incidents, work zones, travel times, and cameras. |
| VDOT traffic counts | Official traffic-count publications and downloadable data. |
These pages organize information by locality and vehicle type. Select the page that most closely matches where the collision occurred and the type of vehicle involved. The correct legal and insurance analysis still depends on the specific facts.
The firm’s published contact page lists offices in Hampton and Smithfield. Its Areas Served page identifies motor vehicle matters in Hampton Roads and in the localities listed below.
Public biographies identify Dante Wright and Maxie Lawton as co-founders and list personal injury among their practice areas. Maxie Lawton’s biography also identifies him as a former U.S. Army Ranger. Those facts do not establish a particular result, case volume, or specialized credential.
Availability, venue, and the issues presented depend on the facts of the matter. Call 757-777-9285 or use the firm’s contact page to ask whether the firm is available to review it.
The firm’s published collision coverage includes the following categories. The facts, parties, records, insurance policies, alleged injuries, and claimed losses vary from one matter to another.
A case-specific review may consider liability, causation, documented losses, and potentially applicable coverage. This page does not determine which parties or policies apply and does not promise that any claimed loss will be recoverable.
Virginia Code § 46.2-894 addresses stopping, reporting identifying information, and rendering reasonable assistance after a collision involving injury, death, or damage to attended property. Virginia Code § 46.2-888 addresses emergency flashers and removal of a movable vehicle from the roadway when the driver can do so safely and no injury or death resulted. The Virginia State Corporation Commission Auto Insurance Consumer Guide provides additional general accident and insurance guidance.
There is no useful one-size-fits-all answer. The identity of the insurer, the person’s relationship to the policy, the policy language, the nature of the claim, and the exact request can matter.
The Virginia State Corporation Commission Auto Insurance Consumer Guide tells policyholders to notify their own agent or company as soon as possible, complete claim forms accurately and completely, and keep copies. The guide does not establish a universal recorded-statement rule for every insurer or claimant.
Before responding to a request, identify the caller, insurer, and claim number; ask whether the conversation will be recorded and what information is requested; and review any relevant policy or written request. Information provided should be accurate. A person should distinguish personal recollection from an estimate and should not guess.
Virginia’s current Model Jury Instructions—Civil explain that a defendant asserting contributory negligence generally bears the burden of proving that the plaintiff was negligent and that the negligence was a proximate cause of the injury. If proved, contributory negligence can bar recovery. That rule makes factual accuracy important, but it does not create a universal rule requiring or forbidding a recorded statement.
This page cannot determine whether a particular statement, authorization, or release is required. A person who is uncertain about a request should obtain advice based on the policy and the specific circumstances.
The current Virginia Model Jury Instructions—Civil state that a plaintiff generally bears the burden of proving the defendant was negligent and that the negligence was a proximate cause of the accident and damages. They also state that the fact an accident occurred does not, by itself, prove negligence.
When contributory negligence is asserted, the model instructions place the burden on the defendant to prove that the plaintiff was negligent and that the plaintiff’s negligence was a proximate cause of the injury. If both parties’ negligence proximately contributed to the accident, the instructions state that the plaintiff’s negligence can bar recovery. The instructions used in a particular case depend on its facts and legal issues.
Evidence used to evaluate liability may include:
A police report, citation, recording, witness statement, vehicle record, or medical record does not automatically resolve civil liability. Relevance, admissibility, and weight depend on the evidence and the issues in the particular matter. Some records may not remain available indefinitely, but this page does not state a universal preservation or filing deadline.
Damages depend on the facts and proof. Virginia’s current Model Jury Instructions—Civil list categories a fact-finder may consider when supported by the greater weight of the evidence and caused by the defendant’s negligence.
The model instructions place the burden on the plaintiff to prove each claimed item and causation by the greater weight of the evidence. An exact amount is not required, but sufficient facts and circumstances must permit a reasonable estimate. This page does not determine which categories or amounts are available in a particular matter.
Punitive damages are different from compensatory damages and are not part of an ordinary negligence award. Virginia Code § 8.01-44.5 provides standards for punitive damages in personal-injury or death actions arising from operation of a motor vehicle, including specified intoxicated-driving circumstances. Virginia Code § 8.01-38.1 limits the total punitive-damages award against all liable defendants to $350,000. Whether the standards are met is case-specific.
Insurance availability and policy terms may affect potential sources of payment. The Virginia SCC Auto Insurance Consumer Guide explains common coverage categories. The declarations, policy, endorsements, parties, and Virginia law must be reviewed before identifying any applicable coverage or limit.
The public biographies for Dante Wright and Maxie Lawton identify them as co-founders of The Phoenix Trial Firm and list personal injury among their practice areas. Both profiles describe representation in Hampton Roads and across Virginia.
To ask whether the firm is available to review a motor vehicle matter, call 757-777-9285 or use its published contact information. Sending information does not mean the firm has accepted the matter and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not send confidential or time-sensitive information until the firm confirms how it should be provided.

"*" indicates required fields
1807 S. Church Street, Suite 200C
Smithfield, VA 23430
2 Eaton Street, Suite 900
Hampton, VA 23669
Copyright © 2026 The Phoenix Trial Firm• All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy. Digital Marketing By: