Personal injury
$730,000
Passenger injury recovery
We recovered $730,000 for a passenger injured when a vehicle turned into oncoming traffic.
Meet our personal injury attorney: Maxie Lawton
Read case details
An injury can change your health, income, and daily life. We help people injured in vehicle collisions across Hampton Roads understand their options and take the next step.
Virginia Code § 46.2-894 addresses stopping, reporting identifying information, and rendering reasonable assistance after a collision involving injury, death, or damage to attended property. Virginia Code § 46.2-888 addresses emergency flashers and removal of a movable vehicle from the roadway when the driver can do so safely and no injury or death resulted. The Virginia State Corporation Commission Auto Insurance Consumer Guide provides additional general accident and insurance guidance.
We represent people injured in the collisions below and help families evaluate claims after a fatal crash. Whether you were driving, riding as a passenger, or struck by a vehicle, we examine how the collision happened and how it affected you.
We handle rear-end, intersection, highway, and multi-vehicle injury claims, including serious and catastrophic injuries. We also help pedestrians and bicyclists struck by vehicles and review uninsured and underinsured motorist claims.
Recovery depends on the facts, supporting evidence, and available coverage; no outcome is guaranteed.
The Phoenix Trial Firm is a Black-owned and military-owned law firm. From our Hampton and Smithfield offices, we help injured people and their families throughout Hampton Roads and across Virginia.
Our co-founder Maxie Lawton is a personal injury attorney and former Army Ranger who served in the U.S. Army Special Operations community. His own recovery from a traumatic brain injury informs his understanding of how an injury can change your work, independence, and family life. Maxie co-founded Phoenix with attorney Dante Wright and brings disciplined preparation, direct communication, and personal attention to injury representation.
We take time to understand what has changed since your collision. Your medical records, work restrictions, and account of daily limitations help us explain the injury’s impact. We prepare carefully for negotiations and evaluate litigation when appropriate.
We investigate the collision and coverage, document your injuries and work losses, and explain settlement or litigation choices. See how a Virginia personal injury claim can develop.
Our personal injury agreement sets attorney fees at 35% of gross recovery before a lawsuit is filed and 45% after litigation begins. We advance litigation costs, reimbursed from a recovery. Under that agreement, no recovery means no attorney fees or those case expenses. Medical balances and liens are separate issues. Read about fees, case expenses, and net proceeds.
Open a question for a fuller explanation and the official sources behind it.
Before you decide how to respond, we need to know which insurer is asking, your relationship to the policy, and what the request involves. Your own insurer’s requirements may differ from those of another driver’s insurer. The policy language and the circumstances of your claim matter.
The Virginia State Corporation Commission Auto Insurance Consumer Guide provides general guidance for policyholders. Whether you must provide a particular recorded statement requires a review of the policy and the request.
Identify the caller, insurer, and claim number. Ask whether the conversation will be recorded and what information is requested, and keep any written request. Give accurate information, distinguish what you remember from what you are estimating, and avoid guessing.
Fault disputes can affect your right to recover, so the details you provide matter. We consider the collision evidence and Virginia’s Model Jury Instructions—Civil when addressing allegations that you contributed to the crash. We explain the contributory-negligence issue below.
If you are unsure about a recorded statement, medical authorization, or release, bring the request to us. We can review it with the relevant policy and explain what it may mean for your injury claim before you respond.
When responsibility is disputed, we look for evidence showing what each driver did and how those actions caused the collision and your injuries. The current Virginia Model Jury Instructions—Civil state that a plaintiff generally bears the burden of proving the defendant was negligent and that the negligence was a proximate cause of the accident and damages. The fact that an accident occurred does not, by itself, prove negligence.
If the defendant argues that you were also negligent, the model instructions place the burden on the defendant to prove your negligence and that it was a proximate cause of your injury. Contributory negligence can bar recovery, subject to applicable exceptions. We review the evidence behind a fault allegation and explain how the law applies to your circumstances; the instructions used in court depend on the facts and legal issues in your case.
Depending on the collision, our investigation may include:
A police report or citation is one part of the investigation. We examine it alongside witness accounts, recordings, vehicle information, and medical evidence instead of assuming any single record resolves responsibility. What evidence can be used in court, and how much weight it carries, depends on the issues in your case. Contact us promptly so we can assess what needs to be preserved and review the deadlines that apply to your claim.
Your claim should account for the ways an injury has affected your health, work, and daily life. We review your records and circumstances to identify the losses supported by the evidence. Virginia’s current Model Jury Instructions—Civil list categories a fact-finder may consider when supported by the greater weight of the evidence and caused by the defendant’s negligence:
We connect each claimed loss to the collision through medical documentation, income records, and other supporting evidence. The model instructions require you to prove each claimed item and its cause by the greater weight of the evidence. An exact amount is not required, but the evidence must allow a reasonable estimate. We discuss which categories may apply to you and what documentation is still needed.
Punitive damages are different from compensatory damages and are not part of an ordinary negligence award. Virginia Code § 8.01-44.5 provides standards for punitive damages in personal-injury or death actions arising from operation of a motor vehicle, including specified intoxicated-driving circumstances. Virginia Code § 8.01-38.1 limits the total punitive-damages award against all liable defendants to $350,000. We evaluate whether the evidence in your case meets those standards; punitive damages are not available in every injury claim.
We also review potentially available insurance coverage, including the declarations, policy terms, endorsements, and the people involved. The Virginia SCC Auto Insurance Consumer Guide explains common coverage categories. Coverage and limits depend on the policies, the facts, and Virginia law; we evaluate those details before advising you about potential sources of payment.
Choose your community for local resources and injury-claim questions.
The Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles’ 2025 Traffic Crash Facts report provides the locality data below. We added the separate crash totals for Chesapeake, Hampton, Newport News, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Suffolk, and Virginia Beach to reach 20,236 reported crashes. This seven-locality sum is our calculation, not a DMV regional total. These figures describe reported collisions; they do not establish fault or the value of an individual injury claim.
| Locality | Crashes | Fatalities | Injuries |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chesapeake | 2,054 | 25 | 1,794 |
| Hampton | 3,352 | 21 | 3,701 |
| Newport News | 3,426 | 18 | 2,685 |
| Norfolk | 3,966 | 26 | 2,306 |
| Portsmouth | 948 | 9 | 772 |
| Suffolk | 1,525 | 10 | 1,084 |
| Virginia Beach | 4,965 | 28 | 3,102 |
| Seven-locality sum | 20,236 | 137 | 15,444 |
Source: Virginia DMV, 2025 Virginia Traffic Crash Facts, jurisdiction table, pp. 3–4. Seven-locality sum calculated by The Phoenix Trial Firm.
Data year: 2025. Page data reviewed: August 23, 2026.
If your collision happened near a Hampton Roads bridge, tunnel, or interstate crossing, identifying the location and direction of travel helps us understand the scene. The VDOT resources below can help you identify a route or crossing and review current reported traffic conditions. They do not establish fault or preserve evidence from your crash; we review the collision records and other available evidence separately.
| Official resource | What it provides |
|---|---|
| VDOT Hampton Roads bridges and tunnels | Names major crossings and identifies the localities and routes they connect. |
| 511 Virginia | Current reported conditions, incidents, work zones, travel times, and cameras. |
| VDOT traffic counts | Official traffic-count publications and downloadable data. |
Tell us what happened and how your injuries have changed your life. Our attorneys can discuss the evidence you already have, the information your claim still needs, and your questions about treatment records, missed work, or insurance requests. We prepare carefully for settlement negotiations and evaluate litigation when appropriate for your circumstances and goals. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Call 757-777-9285 or use our contact page for a free personal injury consultation. This page provides general information, not advice about your specific case. Contacting us does not mean we have accepted your matter or created an attorney-client relationship. Please wait until we confirm how to provide confidential or time-sensitive information before sending it.
Browse all communities and personal injury case types for direct links to local car, truck, rideshare, pedestrian, motorcycle, and wrongful-death guidance.
Tell us what happened, or call 757-777-9285.
An inquiry does not create an attorney-client relationship; representation requires our agreement. Please wait for instructions before sending confidential or time-sensitive material.
"*" indicates required fields
1807 S. Church Street, Suite 200C
Smithfield, VA 23430
2 Eaton Street, Suite 900
Hampton, VA 23669
Copyright © 2026 The Phoenix Trial Firm• All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy. Digital Marketing By:
A welcome from our team
Welcome to The Phoenix Trial Firm. We help people across Hampton Roads with personal injury, criminal defense, DUI, and serious traffic matters. Tell us what brought you here, and our team will help you understand your next steps.
Get a Free Consultation Or call 757-777-9285Hampton Roads trial lawyers
We help injured people and those facing criminal, DUI, or serious traffic charges across Hampton Roads.
Offices in Hampton & Smithfield
Your first conversation
Choose the matter you want to discuss. See how to get started and what to have ready for the conversation.

Start with the collision, your questions, and the changes it has brought to your life.
Good to knowYou do not need every document to make your first inquiry.
Start a conversationTell us when and where the collision happened and how to reach you. A short description is enough to begin an inquiry.
Our team reviews your inquiry. The conversation can cover your injuries, treatment, missed work, insurance questions, and possible next steps.
If we agree to represent you, we explain the scope of our work, fees and costs, and the information needed to begin preparing your claim.

A focused first conversation starts with the matter, the court, and your immediate questions.
Good to knowThis guide introduces the firm’s inquiry process; it does not change any court instruction or deadline.
Start a conversationTell us the charge, the locality or court, and any upcoming court date. Include your contact information so our team can review your inquiry.
Have your charging papers and questions ready for the conversation. We can discuss whether Phoenix is available to review your matter and what a consultation would cover.
If we agree to represent you, we explain the scope of the work and the fee arrangement. Preparation then begins around your particular facts and circumstances.

The details on the summons help us understand the matter you want to discuss.
Good to knowFor DUI or DWI inquiries, choose Criminal defense & DUI above. This overview does not determine whether you must appear in court. That question requires a review of your specific matter.
Start a conversationTell us the charge description, locality or court, and date shown on your summons or later court notice. For speed-related matters, note the alleged speed and posted limit.
Our team reviews your inquiry so we can discuss the circumstances and possible next steps. Mention any work-related driving or license concerns you want considered.
If we agree to represent you, we explain the work covered and the fee arrangement. Your case is prepared around its specific charge, evidence, and circumstances.
Our clients. Our work.
We represent people facing injury, criminal charges, and serious traffic matters. Here are seven outcomes from our work.
Personal injury
Passenger injury recovery
We recovered $730,000 for a passenger injured when a vehicle turned into oncoming traffic.
Meet our personal injury attorney: Maxie Lawton
Read case detailsCriminal defense & DUI
DUI: second offense
Not guilty of second-offense DUI. A conviction on the separate refusal charge remained.
Read case detailsCriminal defense
Strangulation — Chesapeake Circuit Court
The strangulation charge was dismissed. The separate domestic assault and battery charge received a first-offender deferred disposition.
Read case detailsCriminal defense
Felony eluding
The Commonwealth chose not to proceed with the felony-eluding prosecution. Driver identification was the central issue.
Read case detailsCriminal defense
Domestic assault and battery
The court dismissed the charge after considering the client’s testimony, injury photographs, and cross-examination.
Read case detailsCriminal defense
Firearm charges · preliminary hearing
Both charges were dismissed at the Norfolk preliminary hearing and were not certified to circuit court.
Read case detailsSerious traffic
Reckless driving
A challenge to the radar evidence led to a granted motion to strike and dismissal of the reckless-driving charge.
Read case detailsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Passenger injury recovery
Our client was a passenger in a vehicle when the driver turned into oncoming traffic. A severe arm injury required emergency surgery.
The vehicle’s policy provided $250,000 in coverage. Phoenix pursued an underinsured motorist claim and stacked multiple policies for an additional $480,000 in coverage.
We recovered $730,000 for our client.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Second-offense DUI and a separate refusal charge
A stop for failing to obey a highway lane marking led to charges of second-offense DUI and refusal of an official breath test.
The officer reported a slight odor of alcohol and slightly slurred speech. There were no field-sobriety or chemical test results. Phoenix challenged whether the evidence proved DUI beyond a reasonable doubt.
The court found the client not guilty of second-offense DUI because the evidence did not establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The client was convicted of the separate refusal charge.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Chesapeake Circuit Court
Our client faced strangulation and domestic assault and battery charges in Chesapeake Circuit Court following a physical altercation with a partner.
Dante Wright cross-examined the complainant about the reported effects of the altercation. The testimony included no loss of consciousness, no neck marks or bruising, and no hospital treatment or documented neck injury. The defense challenged whether the evidence established the bodily injury required for the strangulation charge and moved to strike.
The court granted the motion to strike and dismissed the strangulation charge. On the separate domestic assault and battery charge, the court found sufficient evidence but granted a first-offender deferred disposition. That charge was not dismissed at this stage.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Felony eluding
A vehicle registered to our client was clocked at more than 100 mph and crashed near a wooded area after police gave chase. It was empty when the officer arrived. Our client was charged with felony eluding.
The vehicle’s registration and personal items linked it to our client, but the officer had no description identifying him as the driver. Phoenix challenged whether the evidence established who was driving. Our client reported the vehicle stolen that night and said he was elsewhere with a sibling.
The Commonwealth chose not to proceed with the felony-eluding charge, which was resolved by nolle prosequi in circuit court.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Navy servicemember · Newport News
Our client, a Navy servicemember, faced a domestic assault and battery charge involving her child’s father.
Dante Wright called our client to testify about the incident, introduced photographs showing bruising and redness on her neck and injuries to her face, and cross-examined the complainant.
The Newport News Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court dismissed the charge. Considering our client’s injuries and the absence of evidence of significant injuries to the complainant, the judge could not determine who was the aggressor.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Norfolk General District Court
Our client faced charges of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and second-offense carrying a concealed weapon at a preliminary hearing in Norfolk General District Court.
Dante Wright cross-examined the officers about the evidence linking our client to the firearm. Officers found an object resembling a gun holster on our client, but no firearm. The gun was recovered elsewhere outside an apartment complex, away from our client. No link to the client or the holster was established; fingerprint testing was inconclusive, and no DNA evidence connected him to the firearm.
Both charges were dismissed at the preliminary hearing and were not certified to circuit court.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
A challenge to the radar evidence
Our client faced a reckless-driving charge involving a radar speed measurement.
At trial, the officer could not confirm that the radar had been checked before and after the shift and found accurate. No calibration certificate was presented. Dante Wright moved to strike the evidence.
The court granted the motion to strike and dismissed the reckless-driving charge.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Answers before your first call
Understand the records to preserve, insurance questions to ask, and how we help injured drivers and passengers.
Read the car-accident guide →Follow the process from investigation and treatment documentation through negotiation and, when appropriate, litigation.
Explore the claim process →Get to know Phoenix
Meet the people behind the firm and learn what to expect when you reach out.
A quick introduction from Dante Wright