Legal-source review: August 24, 2026. Reviewed and approved for publication by Dante Wright, responsible Virginia attorney, on August 24, 2026.
Uninsured-motorist and underinsured-motorist coverage can involve more than one policy, more than one type of election, and different policy dates. A declarations page or a shorthand reference to “stacking” does not answer every coverage question. This guide explains the review framework in general terms. It does not interpret a policy, calculate benefits, decide whether anyone is an insured, or provide legal advice about a particular crash.
The dates above describe statutes and policy events, not a universal answer based only on the crash date. Issue, delivery, renewal, endorsement, election, and loss dates may matter. The complete policy history and current law must be reviewed before applying any rule.
The Virginia DMV insurance-requirements page also lists the current liability minimums for policies effective on or after January 1, 2025. Minimum limits are not a promise that a particular amount is available for a claim, and they are not a calculation of damages or payment.
Section 38.2-2206 defines an “uninsured motor vehicle” to include several circumstances, such as the absence of the required liability coverage, a liability insurer’s denial of coverage, the absence of a qualifying bond or deposit, certain self-insurance issues, and an unknown owner or operator. An underinsured vehicle is defined through a comparison involving liability coverage applicable and available for payment, the damages sustained, and the UIM coverage afforded to the injured person.
Those statutory definitions are more precise than simply asking whether the other driver had insurance or “enough” insurance. Insured status, applicable coverage, other claims from the same occurrence, damages, policy limits, and policy terms all may affect the analysis. This page does not determine whether a vehicle is uninsured or underinsured in any individual matter.
People sometimes use “stacking” to describe two separate questions. The first is whether UIM payment is calculated in addition to applicable liability coverage or is reduced by a credit under a valid written election. The second is whether an injured person is entitled to UM/UIM coverage under more than one policy and, if so, the order in which those policies respond. Treating those questions as interchangeable can produce the wrong conclusion.
The current statutes do not support a rule that every listed policy limit may always be added together. Entitlement under each policy must be established first. Any written election, the person’s status under the policy, the vehicle occupied, the priority rules, available liability coverage, and payments arising from the same occurrence may matter.
This is an issue-spotting sequence, not a payment calculator.
If an injured person is entitled to UM or UIM coverage under more than one policy, § 38.2-2206(B)(2) lists the following order of payment:
When more than one insurer provides coverage at the same priority, the statute apportions their liability according to their respective available UM or UIM coverages. For policies with the elected liability-credit calculation, § 38.2-2206(B)(3) states that the amount available for payment is credited only against policies in the occupied-vehicle priority described in § 38.2-2206(B)(2)(a). If more than one such policy is entitled to the credit, the statute apportions the credit pro rata according to the policies’ respective available UIM coverages. These rules apply only after entitlement and the relevant policy facts are established.
A declarations page may identify vehicles, named insureds, dates, and stated limits, but it may not contain every definition, endorsement, exclusion, condition, notice, or election. It also may not show whether another policy was in force or whether the amount of liability coverage applicable to the claim and available for payment has been reduced by payment of any other claims arising from the same occurrence.
The Virginia State Corporation Commission’s Consumer’s Guide for Auto Insurance is educational and expressly states that it is not an SCC opinion about coverage under a specific policy or contract. That same boundary applies here: general descriptions cannot replace the actual policy and a fact-specific legal review.
Do not send policy numbers, medical records, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, or other sensitive material through a public website form. Use a secure method approved by the recipient. Gathering a document does not mean it controls the answer or should be signed.
Section 38.2-2206(D) addresses a crash caused by an unknown owner or operator when there was no contact with the occupied vehicle, or no contact with the insured person if the person was not in a vehicle. For recovery under the required endorsement, the statute calls for the crash to be reported promptly to either the insurer or a law-enforcement officer with jurisdiction. If prompt reporting is not reasonably practicable, the report must be made as soon as reasonably practicable under the circumstances.
This is a separate issue from any lawsuit deadline, insurance-policy condition, or other notice requirement. The facts and all potentially applicable deadlines should be reviewed without delay; this paragraph does not calculate a deadline or decide whether an exception applies.
No. Those are current owner-policy liability minimums for policies effective on or after January 1, 2025. They do not establish damages, fault, insured status, the number of applicable policies, the amount available for payment, or the outcome of a claim.
Not automatically. Entitlement, policy definitions, vehicle occupancy, named-insured status, statutory priority, limits, written elections, and the facts must be reviewed before any multi-policy calculation.
Sections 38.2-2202(C) and 38.2-2206(A) state that an election by one named insured binds all insureds under that policy. Whether a particular document is the required election and which policy period it affects require review of the actual record.
No. Coverage depends on the contract, endorsements, elections, applicable statutes, and facts. An online guide can identify questions and documents, but it cannot provide an individualized coverage conclusion.
General information only; not legal advice, a policy interpretation, or a prediction of coverage, value, payment, or outcome. Statutes, agency guidance, policy forms, and facts can change. Reviewed and approved for publication by Dante Wright, responsible Virginia attorney, on August 24, 2026.

"*" indicates required fields
1807 S. Church Street, Suite 200C
Smithfield, VA 23430
2 Eaton Street, Suite 900
Hampton, VA 23669
Copyright © 2026 The Phoenix Trial Firm• All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy. Digital Marketing By: