Reviewed against Virginia sources current as of August 21, 2026. A first DUI charge does not determine the outcome, sentence, or driver’s-license result. The charging document, chemical-test allegations, refusal paperwork, prior record, and court orders must be reviewed together. This page provides general information and does not predict what will happen in a particular case.
This page uses “first offense” as shorthand for a first conviction analyzed under Virginia Code § 18.2-270(A). That label should not be assumed from the wording of a webpage. Whether an earlier Virginia, local, federal, or out-of-state matter counts can depend on the statute, disposition, dates, and court record.
The separate under-21 and commercial-vehicle statutes discussed below are not interchangeable with an ordinary first-offense analysis under § 18.2-270. A refusal charge and an administrative license suspension are also separate from the underlying DUI charge.
Virginia Code § 18.2-266 identifies several ways a person may violate the DUI statute. It addresses a qualifying chemical-test result at or above 0.08, being under the influence of alcohol, impairment by drugs, impairment by a combination of alcohol and drugs, and specified concentrations of certain drugs in the blood.
A result below 0.08 does not answer every impairment allegation. Conversely, a charge or reported test result is not itself a conviction. The warrant or summons and the admissible evidence determine which statutory theory is actually at issue. The broader Hampton Roads DUI overview explains the general statutory framework; this page focuses on first-conviction consequences and process.
| Issue | Current statutory rule |
|---|---|
| Base offense under § 18.2-270(A) | Class 1 misdemeanor with a mandatory minimum fine of $250. |
| Class 1 misdemeanor range | Virginia Code § 18.2-11 authorizes up to 12 months in jail and a fine of up to $2,500, either or both. Those are maximums, not a forecast. |
| Alcohol level at least 0.15 but not more than 0.20 | Section 18.2-270 adds a five-day mandatory minimum period of confinement. |
| Alcohol level more than 0.20 | Section 18.2-270 adds a 10-day mandatory minimum period of confinement. |
| Passenger age 17 or younger | Section 18.2-270 adds a $500-to-$1,000 fine and a five-day mandatory minimum period of confinement. |
The boundary at exactly 0.20 matters: the five-day provision covers a level “not more than 0.20,” while the 10-day provision applies when the level is more than 0.20. Mandatory minimum punishments under § 18.2-270 are cumulative, subject to the applicable statutory maximum. Other charges or facts may create consequences not summarized in this table.
Virginia Code § 46.2-391.2 provides for an immediate administrative suspension when the section’s testing or refusal, charging, and notice conditions are met. The stated period for a first-offense charge is seven days. The section also allows court review of the suspension.
An administrative suspension is not a finding of guilt and is distinct from the license consequence imposed after a conviction. It is therefore inaccurate to say that every DUI arrest automatically produces the same suspension without checking the statutory conditions and paperwork.
Subject to the provisions it cross-references, Virginia Code § 18.2-271 provides a one-year loss of driving privilege from the date of judgment for a first conviction under § 18.2-266. Eligibility for a restricted permit, its permitted purposes, and any ignition-interlock condition are governed by the applicable statute and the actual court or DMV order.
Virginia Code § 18.2-271.1 generally requires a person convicted under § 18.2-266 to enter and complete a certified alcohol safety action program. The same section includes a good-cause provision under which the court may decline to order participation after an assessment indicates that intervention is not appropriate. It also governs restricted permits and enumerated driving purposes.
Virginia Code § 18.2-270.1 governs ignition interlock. Under the version reviewed, a restricted license for a conviction under the alcohol-related clauses identified in the section, the combined-influence clause, or § 18.2-266.1 carries an interlock restriction for not less than 12 consecutive months without alcohol-related violations. The section treats specified drug-only clauses differently for a first offense. A six-month statement copied from older material is not a safe description of the current DUI rule.
Restricted-driving eligibility should never be promised from a general page. The conviction theory, prior history, court order, VASAP requirements, vehicle ownership or registration, and commercial-driving status may affect the available relief and conditions.
Virginia Code § 18.2-268.2 applies when a person operates a motor vehicle on a Virginia highway and is arrested for a listed offense within three hours of the alleged offense. It generally calls for breath testing for specified alcohol-related provisions, with blood testing if breath testing is unavailable or the person is physically unable to submit. Drug and combined-influence allegations can involve blood testing under separate language in the section.
Virginia Code § 18.2-268.3 separately addresses unreasonable refusal, advisement, procedures, and penalties. A first unreasonable refusal of a required breath test is a civil offense with a one-year suspension; the section separately provides a one-year suspension for a first unreasonable blood-test refusal.
Current § 18.2-268.3 also permits a defendant found guilty of a first refusal and suspended under the specified first-offense provisions to petition for a restricted license. The court may grant a petition for good cause, subject to statutory restrictions and conditions; it may not authorize operation of a commercial motor vehicle. If relief is granted, the section provides for ignition interlock and VASAP conditions. The prior blanket statement that no restricted license is available during a first-refusal suspension is outdated.
The requested test, arrest timing, location of operation, advisement, medical circumstances, prior record, and documents can change the analysis. This page does not advise anyone to take or refuse a test.
Virginia Code § 18.2-266.1 applies to a person younger than 21 who operates after illegally consuming alcohol and specifies a test result of at least 0.02 but below 0.08. The offense is a Class 1 misdemeanor. Its stated punishment includes a one-year license forfeiture and either a mandatory minimum $500 fine or 50 hours of community service.
The section expressly states that the penalty and license-forfeiture provisions in §§ 18.2-270 and 18.2-271 do not apply to a violation of § 18.2-266.1. A result at or above 0.08 or evidence of impairment may implicate a different charge, but it should not be described categorically as “adult penalties plus the underage charge.”
Virginia Code § 46.2-341.24 applies to operation of a commercial motor vehicle. It makes a concentration of at least 0.04 a lesser-included offense under specified provisions; it does not make 0.04 a universal charging threshold whenever a person happens to hold a CDL.
Virginia Code § 46.2-341.18 separately governs commercial disqualification. It generally provides a one-year disqualification for listed first convictions and a three-year period for specified offenses committed while driving a commercial motor vehicle transporting placarded hazardous materials. It also addresses a CDL holder convicted of listed offenses committed while operating a noncommercial vehicle. The precise conviction, vehicle, cargo, and subsection matter.
The Virginia Court System explains that general district courts handle traffic violations and misdemeanor cases. A first charge under § 18.2-266 is generally a misdemeanor matter, but the locality, court, hearing date, and charge shown on the papers control. Other allegations may follow a different path.
The sequence may include an arraignment or advisement, motions, evidence review, plea discussions, and trial. There is no reliable universal promise that a court date will occur within a certain number of weeks or that a particular reduction, dismissal, or diversion-style outcome will be available.
No item on this list establishes a defense or result by itself. What can be obtained, admitted, challenged, or used depends on the case and the applicable rules.
Record consequences should not be summarized as “permanent” without distinguishing a conviction from a charge that did not result in conviction and without checking the law in effect on the relevant date. Under the current petition-sealing statute, Virginia Code § 19.2-392.12 lists convictions under §§ 18.2-266, 18.2-266.1, and 18.2-268.3 as ineligible for sealing under that section.
Expungement of a charge that does not result in a conviction is a different question and may depend on the disposition, the record, and the version of the law then in effect. A dismissal, acquittal, reduction, or other disposition should be reviewed before anyone states whether expungement or sealing is available.
Does a first DUI mean there will be no jail? No general page can promise that. A Class 1 misdemeanor authorizes jail, and § 18.2-270 adds mandatory confinement for specified elevated test results and for transporting a passenger age 17 or younger. Other allegations may also matter.
Is the seven-day administrative suspension a conviction? No. It is a separate pretrial license process under § 46.2-391.2. The statute provides a route for court review, and the DUI charge still must be resolved in court.
Can a first refusal affect driving privileges? Yes. A first unreasonable refusal can carry a one-year suspension. Current law also provides a petition process for a restricted license after a first refusal finding, subject to good cause and statutory conditions.
Can a lawyer promise a reduction or dismissal? No. The charge, admissible evidence, prior record, procedural history, and decisions of the parties and court vary. A prior outcome or a list of possible issues does not establish what will happen in another case.
The firm’s published attorney profiles list DUI and serious traffic matters among the practice areas of its co-founders. A case-specific review may address the charging papers, license documents, available evidence, prior record, court process, and questions the client should discuss with counsel. These public facts do not imply a credential, ranking, case volume, or result.
To ask whether the firm is available to review a pending Virginia DUI matter, call 757-777-9285 or use the firm’s contact page. Sending information does not mean the firm has accepted the matter and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not send confidential or time-sensitive information until the firm confirms how it should be provided.
This page is general legal information, not legal advice. Reading it or contacting the firm does not by itself create an attorney-client relationship. A Virginia attorney must review the facts, documents, and current law before advising on a particular matter.
Recovered $60,000 for a client injured in an automobile accident.
Recovered $80,000 for a client injured in an automobile accident.
Recovered $100,000 for a client injured in an automobile accident.
Recovered $150,000 for a client injured in an automobile accident.
Recovered $45,000 for a client injured in an automobile accident.
"*" indicates required fields
1807 S. Church Street, Suite 200C
Smithfield, VA 23430
2 Eaton Street, Suite 900
Hampton, VA 23669
Copyright © 2026 The Phoenix Trial Firm• All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy. Digital Marketing By: 