Personal injury
$730,000
Passenger injury recovery
We recovered $730,000 for a passenger injured when a vehicle turned into oncoming traffic.
Meet our personal injury attorney: Maxie Lawton
Read case detailsA Virginia concealed-firearm charge raises several different questions: which statute is listed, what the Commonwealth alleges was concealed, whether a permit was valid at the relevant time, and whether an exception or a separate firearm restriction applies. A charge under § 18.2-308 is not the same issue as forgetting to display a valid permit. It also does not, by itself, resolve whether someone may lawfully possess a firearm.
This guide explains the limited statutory framework and the records that can help identify the issue. It does not determine whether a particular stop, search, charge, or proposed defense is valid.
Read the charging document rather than relying only on a label such as “concealed weapon.” Note the exact code section, any subsection, the alleged offense date, and the court information. Section 18.2-308 includes weapons other than firearms; this page focuses on its firearm and handgun provisions. A different weapon category or a separately charged offense needs its own analysis.
Under Virginia Code § 18.2-308(A), the statutory language addresses carrying an enumerated weapon about the person, hidden from common observation. The statute also treats an observable weapon as hidden when its deceptive appearance disguises its true nature. Applying those terms to a particular object and situation requires more than the charge’s short description. An accusation is not a finding that the statutory requirements have been proved.
Section 18.2-308(A) begins with Class 1 misdemeanor treatment. Under § 18.2-11, a Class 1 misdemeanor permits up to 12 months in jail, a fine of up to $2,500, or both. Those are statutory maximums, not an automatic sentence or a forecast for an individual case.
The concealed-weapons statute provides Class 6 felony treatment for a second violation, or a conviction under the section following a conviction under a substantially similar county, city, or town ordinance. A third or subsequent such violation receives Class 5 felony treatment. A prior arrest alone is not the same thing as a qualifying conviction. The exact prior disposition and the statute or ordinance involved matter; do not assume that every earlier weapons case has the same effect.
For the handgun portion of § 18.2-308(A), the statute identifies a valid concealed-handgun permit issued at the time of the offense as an affirmative defense. Section 18.2-308.01(A) also states that the handgun prohibition does not apply to a person holding a valid permit issued under that article.
Keep the permit’s issuing jurisdiction, issuance and expiration dates, and any existing renewal or status records together. A permit obtained later is not the same document as a permit valid at the alleged offense time. This distinction does not decide a case by itself. Out-of-state recognition, nonresident permits, and special extensions require their own review; this guide does not provide a reciprocity list or decide whether a particular permit qualifies.
Section 18.2-308.01 requires the permit holder described in subsection A to carry the permit while carrying a concealed handgun and, on a law-enforcement officer’s demand, display it with the specified photo identification. The section contains additional provisions for nonresident permit holders and certain deployment-related extensions.
Subsection B provides a $25 civil penalty for failure to display the permit and photo identification upon demand. It allows a court to waive that penalty upon presentation of a valid permit and government-issued photo identification. This narrow civil provision does not turn every concealed-firearm allegation into a $25 matter, establish that an expired permit was valid, or promise dismissal of a criminal charge.
Section 18.2-308(B) provides an exception for a person in the person’s own place of abode or its curtilage. Subsections C and D identify other exceptions with their own requirements. These include specified business, vehicle, activity, and official-duty circumstances; they are not a blanket exception for all private property or every situation involving a car.
An exception should be evaluated against its complete wording and the relevant facts, including other applicable restrictions. This page does not offer instructions for positioning, concealing, transporting, or storing a firearm. Do not use a general description here as permission to carry one in a particular manner or place.
Section 18.2-308.01(C) states that a permit does not authorize firearm possession where otherwise prohibited by law or prohibited by a private-property owner. Separate conduct rules can also matter. For example, § 18.2-308.012(A) addresses a person permitted to carry a concealed handgun who carries that handgun in a public place while under the influence of alcohol, marijuana, or illegal drugs. Its subsection B separately addresses alcohol consumption while carrying a concealed handgun on specified licensed restaurant or club premises. These are different statutory rules, not interchangeable descriptions.
Prior convictions, protective orders, and federal law can raise questions outside this guide. Phoenix’s separate overviews of Virginia firearm rights after a felony and Virginia domestic assault and battery address different topics. Neither a permit nor this article should be treated as a determination of someone’s present firearm eligibility.
Organize records you already have without altering them:
Keep the original documents and distinguish what they say from assumptions about what happened. Do not recreate a weapon’s placement for a photograph or alter potential evidence to illustrate a point. Ask a Virginia attorney how to preserve and review case-specific material securely. Do not post confidential case details publicly.
The useful starting point is the exact allegation, offense-date law, permit status, and existing records—not a general belief that having a permit answers every question. For broader orientation, see Phoenix’s criminal-defense overview. This statewide informational guide makes no prediction about dismissal, sentencing, firearm return, or the outcome of a particular case.
Source research: October 11, 2026, using the linked official Virginia Code public text. This limited statutory overview does not include an independent Shepard’s or KeyCite subsequent-treatment check or a case-law, constitutional, federal-law, or injunction-status analysis. It is general information, not legal advice about an individual matter.
Tell us what happened, or call 757-777-9285.
An inquiry does not create an attorney-client relationship; representation requires our agreement. Please wait for instructions before sending confidential or time-sensitive material.
"*" indicates required fields
1807 S. Church Street, Suite 200C
Smithfield, VA 23430
2 Eaton Street, Suite 900
Hampton, VA 23669
Copyright © 2026 The Phoenix Trial Firm• All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy. Digital Marketing By:
A welcome from our team
Welcome to The Phoenix Trial Firm. We help people across Hampton Roads with personal injury, criminal defense, DUI, and serious traffic matters. Tell us what brought you here, and our team will help you understand your next steps.
Get a Free Consultation Or call 757-777-9285Hampton Roads trial lawyers
We help injured people and those facing criminal, DUI, or serious traffic charges across Hampton Roads.
Offices in Hampton & Smithfield
Your first conversation
Choose the matter you want to discuss. See how to get started and what to have ready for the conversation.

Start with the collision, your questions, and the changes it has brought to your life.
Good to knowYou do not need every document to make your first inquiry.
Start a conversationTell us when and where the collision happened and how to reach you. A short description is enough to begin an inquiry.
Our team reviews your inquiry. The conversation can cover your injuries, treatment, missed work, insurance questions, and possible next steps.
If we agree to represent you, we explain the scope of our work, fees and costs, and the information needed to begin preparing your claim.

A focused first conversation starts with the matter, the court, and your immediate questions.
Good to knowThis guide introduces the firm’s inquiry process; it does not change any court instruction or deadline.
Start a conversationTell us the charge, the locality or court, and any upcoming court date. Include your contact information so our team can review your inquiry.
Have your charging papers and questions ready for the conversation. We can discuss whether Phoenix is available to review your matter and what a consultation would cover.
If we agree to represent you, we explain the scope of the work and the fee arrangement. Preparation then begins around your particular facts and circumstances.

The details on the summons help us understand the matter you want to discuss.
Good to knowFor DUI or DWI inquiries, choose Criminal defense & DUI above. This overview does not determine whether you must appear in court. That question requires a review of your specific matter.
Start a conversationTell us the charge description, locality or court, and date shown on your summons or later court notice. For speed-related matters, note the alleged speed and posted limit.
Our team reviews your inquiry so we can discuss the circumstances and possible next steps. Mention any work-related driving or license concerns you want considered.
If we agree to represent you, we explain the work covered and the fee arrangement. Your case is prepared around its specific charge, evidence, and circumstances.
Our clients. Our work.
We represent people facing injury, criminal charges, and serious traffic matters. Here are seven outcomes from our work.
Personal injury
Passenger injury recovery
We recovered $730,000 for a passenger injured when a vehicle turned into oncoming traffic.
Meet our personal injury attorney: Maxie Lawton
Read case detailsCriminal defense & DUI
DUI: second offense
Not guilty of second-offense DUI. A conviction on the separate refusal charge remained.
Read case detailsCriminal defense
Strangulation — Chesapeake Circuit Court
The strangulation charge was dismissed. The separate domestic assault and battery charge received a first-offender deferred disposition.
Read case detailsCriminal defense
Felony eluding
The Commonwealth chose not to proceed with the felony-eluding prosecution. Driver identification was the central issue.
Read case detailsCriminal defense
Domestic assault and battery
The court dismissed the charge after considering the client’s testimony, injury photographs, and cross-examination.
Read case detailsCriminal defense
Firearm charges · preliminary hearing
Both charges were dismissed at the Norfolk preliminary hearing and were not certified to circuit court.
Read case detailsSerious traffic
Reckless driving
A challenge to the radar evidence led to a granted motion to strike and dismissal of the reckless-driving charge.
Read case detailsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Passenger injury recovery
Our client was a passenger in a vehicle when the driver turned into oncoming traffic. A severe arm injury required emergency surgery.
The vehicle’s policy provided $250,000 in coverage. Phoenix pursued an underinsured motorist claim and stacked multiple policies for an additional $480,000 in coverage.
We recovered $730,000 for our client.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Second-offense DUI and a separate refusal charge
A stop for failing to obey a highway lane marking led to charges of second-offense DUI and refusal of an official breath test.
The officer reported a slight odor of alcohol and slightly slurred speech. There were no field-sobriety or chemical test results. Phoenix challenged whether the evidence proved DUI beyond a reasonable doubt.
The court found the client not guilty of second-offense DUI because the evidence did not establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The client was convicted of the separate refusal charge.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Chesapeake Circuit Court
Our client faced strangulation and domestic assault and battery charges in Chesapeake Circuit Court following a physical altercation with a partner.
Dante Wright cross-examined the complainant about the reported effects of the altercation. The testimony included no loss of consciousness, no neck marks or bruising, and no hospital treatment or documented neck injury. The defense challenged whether the evidence established the bodily injury required for the strangulation charge and moved to strike.
The court granted the motion to strike and dismissed the strangulation charge. On the separate domestic assault and battery charge, the court found sufficient evidence but granted a first-offender deferred disposition. That charge was not dismissed at this stage.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Felony eluding
A vehicle registered to our client was clocked at more than 100 mph and crashed near a wooded area after police gave chase. It was empty when the officer arrived. Our client was charged with felony eluding.
The vehicle’s registration and personal items linked it to our client, but the officer had no description identifying him as the driver. Phoenix challenged whether the evidence established who was driving. Our client reported the vehicle stolen that night and said he was elsewhere with a sibling.
The Commonwealth chose not to proceed with the felony-eluding charge, which was resolved by nolle prosequi in circuit court.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Navy servicemember · Newport News
Our client, a Navy servicemember, faced a domestic assault and battery charge involving her child’s father.
Dante Wright called our client to testify about the incident, introduced photographs showing bruising and redness on her neck and injuries to her face, and cross-examined the complainant.
The Newport News Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court dismissed the charge. Considering our client’s injuries and the absence of evidence of significant injuries to the complainant, the judge could not determine who was the aggressor.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Norfolk General District Court
Our client faced charges of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and second-offense carrying a concealed weapon at a preliminary hearing in Norfolk General District Court.
Dante Wright cross-examined the officers about the evidence linking our client to the firearm. Officers found an object resembling a gun holster on our client, but no firearm. The gun was recovered elsewhere outside an apartment complex, away from our client. No link to the client or the holster was established; fingerprint testing was inconclusive, and no DNA evidence connected him to the firearm.
Both charges were dismissed at the preliminary hearing and were not certified to circuit court.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
A challenge to the radar evidence
Our client faced a reckless-driving charge involving a radar speed measurement.
At trial, the officer could not confirm that the radar had been checked before and after the shift and found accurate. No calibration certificate was presented. Dante Wright moved to strike the evidence.
The court granted the motion to strike and dismissed the reckless-driving charge.
View our case resultsPast results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Answers before your first call
Understand the records to preserve, insurance questions to ask, and how we help injured drivers and passengers.
Read the car-accident guide →Follow the process from investigation and treatment documentation through negotiation and, when appropriate, litigation.
Explore the claim process →Get to know Phoenix
Meet the people behind the firm and learn what to expect when you reach out.
A quick introduction from Dante Wright